On Wednesday, Maryam Mirzakhani became the first woman in 78 years to be awarded the prestigious Fields Medal, considered the highest honor in mathematics. She was selected for "stunning advances in the theory of Riemann surfaces and their moduli spaces."
The Fields Medal is awarded every four years
by the International Mathematical Union to outstanding mathematicians
under 40 who show promise of future achievement. With the announcement
of Mirzakhani and this year's other awardees—Arthur Avila, Manjul
Bhargava, and Martin Hairer—there now have been 54 male and 1 female
medalists.
Many hope Mirzakhani's Fields medal is a sign of change to come. "I
will be happy if it encourages young female scientists and
mathematicians," she said in a press release. Christiane Rousseau, vice president of the International Mathematics Union, told the Guardian
this is "an extraordinary moment" and "a celebration for women,"
comparable to Marie Curie's barrier-breaking Nobel prizes in physics and
chemistry in the early 20th century.
And as Canadian math professor Izabella Laba wrote:
"Mirzakhani's selection does exactly nothing to convince me that women
are capable of doing mathematical research at the same level as men. I
have never had any doubt about that in the first place…What I take from
it instead is that we as a society, men and women alike, are becoming
better at encouraging and nurturing mathematical talent in women, and
more capable of recognizing excellence in women's work."
Mirzakhani's accomplishment is all the more groundbreaking in light
of the well-documented disadvantages and biases women face in math and
science. According to the National Academy of Sciences,
there are no significant biological differences that could explain
women's low representation in STEM academic faculty and leadership
positions (although that doesn't stop prominent people from making claims otherwise.) Instead, NAS says we can thank bias and academia's "outmoded institutional structures."
For example, in a 2008 Yale study, professors were asked to rate
fictional applicants for a lab manager position. When given an
application with a male name at the top, professors rated the candidate more competent and hirable than when given an otherwise identical form with a female name. This bias was found in both male and female faculty members.
And that's not all women in STEM fields have to contend with: A July
report found that a full 64 percent of women in various scientific
fields were sexually harassed while doing fieldwork.
No comments:
Post a Comment