The game of chess makes one of the most important contributions to the field of education. Inherent in it are the basic principles of psychological learning theory: Memory, Pattern Recognition, Decision making, and Reinforcement. All of these variables interact during a game of chess and produce the results of the human thought process: a win or a loss. Chess is a closed system.
The number of possible moves and
variations is finite, although this number is extremely large. Because
of its being a closed system, the game can be analyzed and organized for
study, just like music, or calculus, or a foreign language. Once the
player has incorporated the rule schema (system of rules) for chess,
everything he learns about the opening, middle‑game, and endgame is
based upon this rule system. If a player's understanding of the rule
schema is of a high level, then it is very likely that his learning
progress will be very rapid. With the aforementioned as an
introduction, I would like to discuss the contribution which chess does
indeed make to education and learning.
During my two years of psychological research in chess, I have
discovered certain facts about the game which relate to human cognitive
processes:
Memory Improvement
Chess has done wonders for people in this area. Players of all levels have admitted that their general memory has significantly improved as a result of over-the-board play and home analysis. The nature of the game is such that the visual aspects of the game (positional configurations, anticipated piece movements, diagonals, ranks, files, etc.) make deep impressions on that area of the mind which is responsible for memory.
Chess has done wonders for people in this area. Players of all levels have admitted that their general memory has significantly improved as a result of over-the-board play and home analysis. The nature of the game is such that the visual aspects of the game (positional configurations, anticipated piece movements, diagonals, ranks, files, etc.) make deep impressions on that area of the mind which is responsible for memory.
Visual stimuli tend to improve memory more than any other stimuli; thus,
chess serves well in this area. It should also be noted that recall is
also improved. Many of my subjects have claimed that they can now recall
in detail events which would have been obscure to them before they had
taken up the game seriously. It would seem, then, chess is definitely an
excellent memory exerciser the effects of which are transferable to
other subjects where memory is necessary.
LogicI do not believe
that anyone is born with a superior faculty for logic. I believe that
logic is created and developed as a result of other psychological
contingencies related to human learning. The kind of logic employed in
chess is based largely upon the rule schema, but not entirely. The
element of "player psychology" enters the picture and sometimes creates
its own logic. Player "A" may choose a move not because it is most
logical, but because he believes that player "B" will not see the reason
behind it. Yet many of the players I have interviewed have asserted
that chess either sharpened or created a unique sense of logic which
they have applied to other aspects of life successfully. They feel that
they make fewer mistakes where decision-making is concerned either in
chess or out of it.
Observation and AnalysisBy
observation I mean awareness. Chess has the unique ability of teaching
the player to become aware of details and the nuances of every
position. The player learns to observe the whole board and recognize
both the important and unimportant aspects of the position. In short,
the player is conditioned to observe and become aware.
The effects of
this conditioning are transferable. The college student, for example,
who plays chess, may now find that when he studies for a test, he can
separate the important from the unimportant facts; he also tends to
notice and consider the small details of the material he is reading. He
has learned to observe, and this is crucial.
In the area of analysis the
chess player is required to make mental calculations based upon the
observed position and his knowledge of the rules. He learns to "see"
deeply into position the possible tactical moves which may result in an
advantage for him. He then calculates, always being guided by the rule
schema. Many of my subjects who are either college or high school
students have said that they can analyze and set up problems much better
than before they studied chess. They admit (at least some of them,
anyway) that they are better able to solve math problems by transferring
the same kind of methodology used in chess.
Operant ConditioningThis
is by far the most important aspect of chess which directly relates to
human learning. In human psychology operant conditioning involves the
learner actually doing, observing and responding to the stimuli
presented to him. In chess the same holds true. The player makes moves
based on his knowledge of the rules, his analysis and observations and
above all, his judgment. After his opponent's reply, he sees the results
of his thought process.
From this experience he learns. He learns
from operating on what he has analyzed. In a way chess is more complete
than most college studies. In many subjects the learner never gets a
chance to operate on what he observes and analyzes. Thus, learning is
incomplete and the learner gets turned off to further learning. In
psychology parlance, he becomes negatively reinforced. In chess,
however, the learner receives positive reinforcement. He obtains
immediate knowledge of the results (the KR contingency).
Chess is a marvelous game, whether it be science or art, which should
be instituted in schools and colleges throughout this country as it is
in other countries. Its benefits to education are evident. In my two
interviews, one with Dutch grandmaster Jan Timman, and the other with
Bent Larsen, both told me about the success of chess in the elementary
and secondary schools of their respective countries. Timman said, "The
future for chess in the schools is getting better and better.
There are
now special teachers for chess who give instruction to children." And
Larsen commented, "In ordinary school in the ninth and tenth grades,
students can select chess as a school activity... what you hear about
school chess in Denmark comes from an organization outside the Danish
Chess Federation. It organizes a lot of chess in schools after school
hours. This is increasing in popularity." I sincerely hope that chess
instruction, lectures, praxis, etc. can find its way into the college
curriculum on a steady basis. In the Soviet Union, for instance, at the
Institute for Physical Culture and Sport, a student, usually in the
master category, can major in chess! In fact, I think it was Anatoly
Karpov who wrote his Bachelor's thesis on the games of Bobby Fischer.
To conclude, I would like to quote that talented Soviet GM and chess
teacher, Alexander Kotov. "It is not difficult to combine a very strong
attraction to chess with work and study. My own experience was that not
only did chess not hinder my studies at school and in college, but even
proved to be helpful as it played a part in development habits of
logical thought."
No comments:
Post a Comment